What Does Ceteris Paribus Mean and How Is It Used

Definition: Ceteris Paribus means assuming all else is held constant. The author using ceteris paribus is attempting to distinguish an effect of one kind of change from any others. The term ceteris paribus is often used in economics to describe a situation where one determinant of supply or demand changes while all other factors affecting supply and demand remain unchanged.  Such an all else being equal analysis is important because it allows economists to tease out specific cause and effect in the form of comparative statics, or analysis of changes in equilibrium.  In practice, however, it is often difficult to find such all else being equal situations because the world is complicated enough that it is typical for many factors to change at the same time.  That said, economists can use various statistical methods in order to simulate a ceteris paribus situation in order to estimate cause and effect relationships. Terms related to Ceteris Paribus: Ex PostEx AnteA Fortiori About.Com Resources on Ceteris Paribus: Canadian Dollar Hits ParThe U.S. Dollar, Oil and the FedIs There a Tradeoff Between Effective Spending and Fast Spending? Writing a Term Paper? Here are a few starting points for research on Ceteris Paribus: Journal Articles on Ceteris Paribus: Ceteris paribus laws and socio-economic machinesCeteris paribus, there is no problem of provisosCeteris paribus conditions: materiality and the application of economic theories

Coming of Age in Mississippi by Ann Moody Essay - 851 Words

Coming of Age in Mississippi Coming of Age in Mississippi by Ann Moody is detailing the experiences while growing up as a black woman in rural Mississippi before and during the civil rights movement. The memoir covers Ann’s life from her childhood to adulthood. It provides a fascinating glance at the lives of Negroes working in the plantations several years before the start of civil rights movement. It clearly outlines the poverty, desperation and suffering experienced by blacks who worked for the whites in their homes (Moody 2011, 15). The book presents a unique approach employed by the author when confronted with the issues of racism and most of all, dealing with the rights of African- American people. This paper will be based on the†¦show more content†¦Instead, they feared raising an alarm, lest they get fired from their jobs and eventually having their families starve to death. One of the most outstanding themes in this story is the manner in which the author expresses pure honesty in her views. She gives an honest opinion concerning any issue that affects her life without being belittled by the status of the individual or what other would say. The fact that she gives her positive and negative feelings about something is very impressive given that she grows gradually in the autobiography. During her former years, she is very honest when expressing her feelings about her dad after he left them for another woman. She is also very disgusted by the irresponsible behavior of George Lee after he claimed that she was the one who lit their house, thereby making her to be thoroughly beaten by her dad (Moody 2011, 12). She felt like killing him by herself for incriminating her in the offence. In another instance, she was very mad at her mom for refusing to accept the money that her dad had offered them. She could not understand why she refused to take the money, and yet they were eating beans every day. The money could have catered for some additional ingredients such as meat in the diet. The most amazing thing concerning the author’s honest views on anything that surrounded her is that she even showed distaste with God. According to her, she believed that there would be noShow MoreRelatedSinging The Praises Of The Unsung Hero1309 Words   |  6 Pagespeople regularly do not receive credit for their daily efforts because individually their actions did not ensue large-scale results but as a collective population they served a major role in the civil rights movement. Anne Moody’s narrative, Coming of Age in Mississippi, details the life of one of these ‘ordinary’ people who, as an African American, experienced daily suppression and despite being neglected of praise, fought to change they way people of color were treated in the south. The hero figureRead More Coming of Age in Mississippi Essay example639 Words   |  3 Pages The first main event that I believe led to Anne Moody becoming an activist for Civil Rights was when she was younger, her cousin George Lee was babysitting and he burned down the house in a fit of rage and when Daddy gets home he blames it on Essie Mae (Anne Moody). This foreshadows all of life’s injustices that will be thrown her way. The next time was when she made friends with white neighbors and they decided to go to the movies, Anne couldn’t sit with her friends, she had to sit in the balconyRead MoreAnn Moody and the Civil Rights Movement Essay795 Words   |  4 Pageswas simple: if the U.S. Constitution failed for one race, it would fail for everyone. ... It was scary for Ann Moody, an author and one of the leaders of the modern Civil Rights movement. Moody knew that only loud, public protests could change laws and sentiments. Others had driven that point home long before she was born. And Today, as in Moodys Coming of Age in Mississippi, about life in the rural South during the 1940s and 1950s, the creed is the same: staying quiet means suffering theRead MoreEssay about Coming Of Age In Mississippi1377 Words   |  6 Pages Coming of Age in Mississippi is an eye-opening testimony to the racism that exemplified what it was like to be an African American living in the south before and after the civil rights movements in the 50s and 60s. African Americans had been given voting and citizen rights, but did not and to a certain degree, still can not enjoy these rights. The southern economy that Anne Moody was born into in the 40s was one that was governed and ruled by a bunch of whites, many of which who very prejudiceRead MoreEssay on Unity Amid Diversity1691 Words   |  7 PagesUnity Amid Diversity The 1950’s and 1960’s was a dawning of a new age. Many changes were occurring within America’s society. Segregation was prominent with the passing of Plessy vs. Ferguson, however, the Jim Crow laws of the south were being challenged. Negroes in the south wanted equality and justice. The nation was in need of an ethic of caring and a solid identity of what it meant to be an â€Å"American.† With the war in Vietnam and the war for equality, people were fed up with all of theRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesSkills 19 †¢ Stimulating Innovation and Change 20 †¢ Coping with â€Å"Temporariness† 20 †¢ Working in Networked Organizations 20 †¢ Helping Employees Balance Work–Life Conflicts 21 †¢ Creating a Positive Work Environment 22 †¢ Improving Ethical Behavior 22 Coming Attractions: Developing an OB Mod el 23 An Overview 23 †¢ Inputs 24 †¢ Processes 25 †¢ Outcomes 25 Summary and Implications for Managers 30 S A L Self-Assessment Library How Much Do I Know About Organizational Behavior? 4 Myth or Science? â€Å"Most

Counterterrorism vs Civil Liberties Free Essays

The fall of Hussein’s regime marked the dawn of the advocacy towards counterterrorism. The war between the United States and the former Iraqi government had really severed the relationship of the two states (Davis, 2002). The war ended with the US as the victor. We will write a custom essay sample on Counterterrorism vs Civil Liberties or any similar topic only for you Order Now Yet the true battle has not been started yet. There are still potential forces that are really capable of destroying the world order again. Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda group are not yet captured. Hence, there are reasons for US not to take its eyes off on the possibility of another outbreak may be it in the Middle East or any place in the globe. What Counterterrorism Is? Counterterrorism pertains to the techniques and strategies that are geared against terrorism (Howard Sawyer, 2005). Counterterrorism does not limit itself from solely being formed and employed by a particular government. It includes all groups and sectors of the society. It is impossible to make the advocacy towards counterterrorism without needing the help of other agencies such the business sector. Certainly, the citizens of the state must be well-informed about the scope and limitations of such campaign so as to get their perspectives regarding it. The campaign for counterterrorism starts with a plan. In the formulation of the plan, various strategies, tactics, and techniques are also developed to respond to terrorist attacks. The plan normally includes â€Å"special forces† and teams that are directly responsible for the implementation of particular strategies against the terrorists (Howard Sawyer, 2005). In this contemporary period, campaigns for counterterrorism are becoming prevalent not only in the Western regions but also in the Eastern and Southern regions. The United States has started to solicit support form its allied countries to materialize its plan of combating terrorism. US Policy on Counterterrorism As mentioned in the introduction, the great efforts of the US to strengthen its position against terrorism started after the September 11 bombing which put the whole of US in big indignity. The US drafted a national as well as international policy against terrorism. The US Counterterrorism Policy states that it strongly espouses a war against terrorism and all other forms of it. The policy stressed that the US shall vigorously act so as to defeat terrorist attacks against the state and the citizens (Naftali, 2005). According to the policy, the US government including all its major departments and agencies shall put great effort so in order to reduce the vulnerabilities of the US on terrorism (Naftali, 2005). All the departments and agencies mentioned in the policy shall see to it that the counterterrorism campaign of the state is given the highest priority. Such that it shall secure that all of their areas of responsibility are protected from terrorist attacks (Davis, 2002). In addition, the policy states that its implementation shall be appropriately and effectively employed by all US departments and agencies by shouldering all the costs of its implementation as well as developing efficient and useful technologies that can really contribute in countering terrorism (Naftali, 2005). The US Counterterrorism Policy is not only limited in the state’s national territory. In fact, its policy extends even outside US. It requires that countries who house particular terrorist groups shall be able to cooperate with them. It is clearly stated in the policy that the US government will be using all means to get terrorist groups from their host country no matter if the latter agrees or not. And those countries that refuse to do so would be labeled as advocates of terrorism thus they shall be treated as enemies of the state. Such is the scope of the US policy on counterterrorism (Howard Sawyer, 2005). Counterterrorism vs. Civil Liberties The former or the traditional surveillance in the US has been developed into something that which is superior in terms of its strict implementation. Yet, as we all know, everything that exceeds the normal is evil. In US, people are said to be more secured and protected against any forms of violence particularly by terrorism (Darmer Baird, 2004). This is due to the fact that the US government gives priority to the enforcement of the anti-terrorism or counterterrorism policy. As consequences, people are confident enough of their safety wherever they are in the globe. However, such strictness in the counterterrorism policy implies the curtailment of certain civil liberties of its citizens. As mentioned earlier, all US departments and agencies have been instructed to do their very best and to prioritize the campaign against terrorism. By doing so, people would not really be able do their thing as how they do it before. This means that they have to sacrifice their some of their freedom (i. e. privacy) just to ensure that the policy on counterterrorism is not being obstructed by anyone or anything (Darmer Baird, 2004). This seems to be problematic especially for those advocates of human rights. By implementing the policy, the government has given a direct authority over the citizen’s life so as to secure that there are no threats of terrorism. It may seem beneficial to all because they are being protected by the state. Yet people may also experience severe interference and intervention from the government (Howard Sawyer, 2005). And these things are not really good for the government inflicts pointless suffering on its citizens. As reported, there are increasing numbers of human rights victims in the US whose grievances are caused by the policy on counterterrorism. Furthermore, it undermines the welfare of the people in the sense that it gives more priority (i. e. higher subsidy for military) to the campaign against terrorism than giving more funds for education, and social and heath services (Darmer Baird, 2004). References: Darmer, M. K. , Baird, R. M. (2004). Civil Liberties Vs. National Security In A Post 9/11 World . Prometheus Books . Davis, P. K. (2002). Deterrence and Influence in Counterterrorism: A Component in the War on Al Qaeda. RAND Corporation . Howard, R. D. , Sawyer, R. L. (2005). Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Understanding the New Security Environment, Readings and Interpretations (2nd ed. ). McGraw Hill/Dushkin. Naftali, T. (2005). Blind Spot: The Secret History of American Counterterrorism . Amazon Remainders Account . How to cite Counterterrorism vs Civil Liberties, Papers

Epiphanys threshold Essay Example For Students

Epiphanys threshold Essay My soul today is heaven on earth / O could the transport last,' sing two women at the end of the first scene of Brian Friels recent play, Wonderful Tennessee. And in answer to the question posed in the hymn, one wants to shout as Angela, one of the plays six mortality-haunted characters, will later in the play Yes, Yes, Yes! Now 64, the Irish dramatist has devoted his astonishing career to moments of transport sure to number among the lasting achievements of contemporary drama. This year in the US., those achievements are finding their broadest exposure yet. Dancing at Lughnasa, Friels 1990 memory play whose accumulated laurels include a Best Play Olivier award in London and three Tony awards, is the most widely produced script in the American regional theatre this season, according to its Broadway producer, Noel Pearson. (At least 24 productions will have been seen by seasons end, including three playing this month in Alabama, Minnesota and Wisconsin.) On April 12, the Long Wharf Theatre in New Haven, Conn. starts a month-long engagement of the Abbey Theatre of Dublins extraordinary production of Faith Healer, with the same trio of actors that galvanized Londons Royal Court Theatre two years ago: Donal McCann, Sinead Cusack and Ron Cook. In August, that shows director, Joe Dowling, makes his Roundabout Theatre debut in New York with a revival of Philadelphia, Here I Come! (through Oct. 2), the play that first introduced Broadway audiences to Friel nearly 30 years ago. In 1995, Pearson plans to produce a revival of Translations, under the direction of Robin Lefevre, on Broadway. We were always balanced somewhere between the absurd and the momentous, comments an earlier Frank the itinerant con man at the heart of Faith Healer, arguably Friels greatest play, as well as his most structurally dense and challenging. Friels plays, in fact, inhabit exactly that point somewhere between. He tells of lives spent on the threshold of epiphany, of people who, like the kindred Franks in these plays, are thrown back on the often grotesque absurdity of their own condition. (Such is doubly the case in Faith Healer whose voluble hero owe ultimately discover speaking from beyond the grave.) Epiphanies arrive, but Friel insists we take from them not the momentous occassio ns themselves but their lingering after-effects. In Dancing at Lughnasa, the blazing revel of the title comes not at any natural point of climax but midway through Act 1, as the five spinsterish Mundy sisters find release from working-class drudgery one summer day in 1936 in a Dionysiac outburst common to Friels work. (In Faith Healer, Frank signposts an authorial leitmotif at the end of his first monologue, recalling A Dionysian night. A Bacchanalian night. A frenzied, excessive Irish night when ritual was consciously and relentlessly debauched.) Some argue that Lughnasa errs in playing its titular card so early, but surely the plays true dance lies elsewhere: in the hypnotic movements accompanying the surrender of to be in touch with some otherness which the narrator Michael, an authorial alter ego gently write large, speaks wistfully of in his closing soliloquy. Similarly, Wonderful Tennessee might seem to peak too early in the cancerous Georges ferocious accordion rendition of the Moonlight Sonata played, his wife Trish says, as if he were afraid to stop. But Friel fearlessly plunges ahead, allowing the reflective silence following Georges recital to inform every moment of the play thereafter. Otherness is this plays theme, too specifically so, since its characters are all trying to get to one Oilean Draiochta, the so-called Island of Otherness, Island of Mystery and it is essential to Friels method that these ecstatic bursts hover as a link between the pagan, the aesthetic and the transcendental making a nonsense of formal religion. (Not for nothing did Friel abandon teenage aspirations to the priesthood.) This dramatist writes metaphysical mood pieces not showstoppers, and his most haunting passages lie in his characters inevitable reacquaintance with this world even as they acknowledge, usually silently, the next. Low comedy and high ideals EssayBut its meant as no slight to Philadelphia! to note the later plays maturity set against the earlier ones youthful exuberance (and occasional stylistic infelicities). Both Tennessee and Lughnasa bear the imprint of a man who knows his classic literate Friel has worked regularly as a translator of Chekhov (Three Sisters) and Turgenev (Fathers and Sons, A Month in the Country) in particular and Tennessee especially seems to evoke Uncle Vanya in its characters ceaseless assessments of their own emotional states. (The psychic temperature-taking, much of it coupled with the ironic usage of songs like I Want to Be Happy, follows from Graces rending litany happy, happy, happy!  in Faith Healer.) For in the end, Friels career describes a continuum whose component parts finally bleed into one. The quotes juxtaposed at the start of this piece show both how long and how short that journey has been. In Philadelphia!, Private Gar looks ahead to a time when what remains in the memory is going to be precious, precious gold, whereas in Lughnasa onwards that alchemy exists in the moment in those assuaging notes and hushed rhythms of life right now. No wonder the bookie Terry in Wonderful Tennessee fails to arrive at his island, as pregnant an image of death as Harold Pinters no mans land. Death is very much more a reality now for a dramatist whose work has always carried intimations, and then some, of mortality. But like Frank Hardy in Faith Healer, who refuses even posthumously to be silenced, Friel will not stop asserting the richness of this life and the mystery of the Other. To attest to affirm to acknowledge, exults Angela in Tennessees final crescendo, and one senses the playwright right there with her, singing the sad, sweet song of existence which is, in the end, wonderful.